Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriela Ce vs Mara Schmidt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ce vs Schmidt analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriela Ce vs Mara Schmidt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ce 1 - 0 Schmidt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ce has won 41.54% of points on his second serve, while Schmidt has won 38.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ce, in recent form, has won 57.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schmidt has won 55.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.29% and 33.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ce has saved 54.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schmidt has saved 40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ce has won 45.9% of matches played (W/L 28/ 33), with Schmidt winning 27.27% (W/L 3/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 356/ 260), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Schmidt has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 33/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Ce has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 39.62% of matches (W/L 21/ 32), where as Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ce winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ce winning 2 and Schmidt winning 0. The last match between Ce and Schmidt was at the W100 Bonita Springs, 02-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Gabriela Ce getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ce and Schmidt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ce winning 0 times and Schmidt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ce winning 0, and Schmidt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ce has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.33 while Schmidt has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ce has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schmidt has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ce has converted 52.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schmidt has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
438
Rank
221
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
724
High
32
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (427-342)
Career Total W/L
41% (68-98)
56% (15-12)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$26,182
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Mara Schmidt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:0 | 1:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (30/51) | 44% (14/32) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (24/30) | 21% (3/14) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (9/21) | 33% (6/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 72% (23/32) | 35% (18/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Gabriela Ce
Player
Mara Schmidt
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
14 of
32)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Mara Schmidt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (15/12) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (33/27) | 27% (4/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (289/260) | 44% (55/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 114 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:53 | 1:10:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 206.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (1357/1869) | 56% (176/315) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (780/1357) | 57% (100/176) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (215/512) | 39% (54/139) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (124/230) | 47% (14/30) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (879/1795) | 42% (125/300) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (8/11) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Gabriela Ce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Gabriela Ce
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Veronika Podrez
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Enola Chiesa
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Giorgia Pinto
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
24 of
33)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Nicole Gadient
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Gabriela Ce
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aravane Rezai
Player
Gabriela Ce
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Gabriela Ce
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mara Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Osuigwe
Player
Mara Schmidt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Mara Schmidt
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
13
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Marton
Player
Mara Schmidt
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mara Schmidt
Player
Unknown Player
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriella Vannessa Lindgren
Player
Mara Schmidt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Meisha Kendall-Woseley
Player
Mara Schmidt
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
21 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Mara Schmidt
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Mara Schmidt
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ce Vs Schmidt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
